lowering on Georgia slightly with time and with the lack of a ceasefire. If there had been a favorable ceasefire for Putin, I would have probably raised most of these by about a percentage point. If there is no ceasefire before April 2027, it seems difficult to imagine a second offensive, but a somewhat favorable ceasefire is in the realm of possibility.
0.231717
Relative Brier Score
Questions Forecasted
Scored Questions
121
Forecasts
22
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forecasts | 3 | 16 | 201 | 121 | 864 |
Comments | 3 | 14 | 103 | 97 | 271 |
Questions Forecasted | 3 | 14 | 43 | 30 | 120 |
Upvotes on Comments By This User | 1 | 3 | 41 | 22 | 170 |
Definitions |


Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
Outside of the ceasefire scenarios, I think one thing that might move the likelihood would be pro-western or anti-Russian demonstrations or policies in any of these countries. I don't think they would change things materially, but I think it could make a difference on the margin.

Why do you think you're right?
I'll stay where I am for the time being. I think that even in the most likely scenario to cause this, which I think is a ceasefire, this is still unlikely. Even still, I'm a bit higher than the crowd on the chances of a ceasefire this year and within that space, this is a plausible event.
Why might you be wrong?
Even though I'm quite low in absolute terms, I'm much higher than the crowd due in relative terms due to my uncertainty, so perhaps the median forecaster has good reasons to be more certain.
I'm much higher than the crowd due in relative terms
Current median is at 1.34%, so I don't think you are much higher... π

Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?



Star Commenter - Jul 2025

Why do you think you're right?
Based on I'm about 80% confident that this could be done if it were prioritized / funded (70% this happens), but, for all I know, this might get crowded out by other priorities (or as @belikewater pointed out, this could be derailed by war).
Why might you be wrong?
It seems like this doesn't require breakthroughs, but just engineering, but maybe this is more complicated than I'm imagining. I can think of other problems that are mostly engineering challenges that have been hard to crack (e.g. fusion).

Why do you think you're right?
It was already unlikely to happen due to the limited time, but @404_NOT_FOUND 's recent comments convinced me that the chances are low enough that I can round them down to zero. Potentially angering the Trump administration is yet another reason why this is unlikely.
Why might you be wrong?
As I've mentioned before, an announcement is a very low bar. If it happens I'll be quite surprised but every now and again a 1/250 chance happens.

Why do you think you're right?
Lowering slightly on the lack of news. As I mentioned in my last forecast, I'm guessing the majority of Chinese military efforts between now and the end of this question will be focused on areas applicable to Taiwan.
Why might you be wrong?
A focus on capabilities related to Taiwan doesn't preclude expansion in Africa, and maybe it will become a priority, particularly if investments in nearby areas are increased.

Why do you think you're right?
My distribution is bi-modal. If the ceasefire is stable for more than 30 days, it seems like it could have a good chance of making it more than 90. I think at this point, both sides are at least interested in some kind of compromise, but they're still probably pretty far away from each other.
Why might you be wrong?